Coursekit is now Lore.
What’s the Story?
A bite-sized companion to Brain Pickings by Maria Popova.
Twitter: @explorer

Scientists do their work by assuming that every phenomenon can be reduced to a material, mechanistic cause and by excluding any possibility of nonmaterial explanations. And the materialist assumption works really, really well—in detecting and quantifying things that have a material or mechanistic explanation. Materialism has allowed us to predict and control what happens in nature with astonishing success. The jaw-dropping edifice of modern science, from space probes to nanosurgery, is the result.

But the success has gone to the materialists’ heads. From a fruitful method, materialism becomes an axiom: If science can’t quantify something, it doesn’t exist, and so the subjective, unquantifiable, immaterial “manifest image” of our mental life is proved to be an illusion.

Here materialism bumps up against itself.

Andrew Ferguson considers the implications of philosopher Thomas Nagel’s provocative Mind and Cosmos
219 notes
  1. threestarsmash reblogged this from explore-blog
  2. erroriamnoonedeactivated201601 reblogged this from sagansense
  3. randomizedred reblogged this from sagansense
  4. mechanomorph-blog reblogged this from sagansense
  5. ripbrandy2010-2015-blog reblogged this from sagansense
  6. demolishingtheberm reblogged this from sagansense
  7. thsissilent reblogged this from sagansense
  8. sagansense reblogged this from explore-blog
  9. banjomeow reblogged this from explore-blog
  10. everythingsallright reblogged this from explore-blog
  11. vulpeko reblogged this from explore-blog
  12. akataplexia reblogged this from jkeith757
  13. liminalkitty518 reblogged this from jkeith757
  14. tristealven reblogged this from explore-blog
  15. heimspacehub-blog reblogged this from jackhagley
  16. jackhagley reblogged this from explore-blog
  17. mirkozol reblogged this from universalmarce
  18. novelcombinationofwords reblogged this from lumlination
  19. explore-blog posted this